← Back to blog

7 Best Web-to-Markdown Tools in 2025 (Compared)

· Save Team
comparison tools web-clipper roundup

Converting webpages to Markdown has become essential for note-taking, AI workflows, and documentation. Here are the 7 best tools in 2025, compared.

Quick Comparison

ToolTypeAI-PoweredBest For
SaveExtensionYesClean extraction, AI workflows
MarkDownloadExtensionNoOpen-source, offline use
Obsidian Web ClipperExtensionNoObsidian users
Notion Web ClipperExtensionNoNotion users
Jina ReaderAPIYesDevelopers, automation
PandocCLINoTechnical users, batch processing
html2textCLI/LibraryNoDevelopers, Python users

1. Save (Best Overall)

Type: Browser Extension Price: Free (3/mo), Pro (100/mo) Platforms: Chrome, Edge, Brave, Arc

Save is an AI-powered extension that intelligently extracts the main content from any webpage. Unlike simple HTML-to-Markdown converters, Save:

  • Removes ads, navigation, and clutter automatically
  • Has optimized extraction for 50+ popular sites
  • Summarizes YouTube video transcripts
  • Extracts Twitter threads cleanly
  • Produces token-efficient output for AI workflows

Pros:

  • Cleanest output of any tool
  • Works on any website
  • Special handling for social media and video
  • Great for feeding content to ChatGPT/Claude

Cons:

  • Requires internet (API-based)
  • Limited free tier

Best for: Anyone who wants clean Markdown without manual cleanup.

Try Save →

2. MarkDownload

Type: Browser Extension Price: Free (open-source) Platforms: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari

MarkDownload converts the entire webpage to Markdown using Turndown.js. It’s straightforward and works offline.

Pros:

  • Completely free and open-source
  • Works offline
  • Unlimited conversions
  • Available on all major browsers

Cons:

  • Captures everything (including navigation, ads)
  • Requires manual cleanup
  • No special handling for different site types

Best for: Users who need offline functionality or unlimited free conversions.

3. Obsidian Web Clipper

Type: Browser Extension Price: Free Platforms: Chrome, Brave, Edge, Arc

Official web clipper from the Obsidian team. Saves pages directly to your Obsidian vault.

Pros:

  • Direct integration with Obsidian
  • Choose folder and add tags before saving
  • Highlight and annotate
  • Free with no limits

Cons:

  • Only works with Obsidian
  • Basic content extraction
  • No AI processing

Best for: Obsidian users who want seamless vault integration.

4. Notion Web Clipper

Type: Browser Extension Price: Free Platforms: Chrome, Firefox, Safari

Saves webpages directly to Notion databases.

Pros:

  • Direct Notion integration
  • Add to databases automatically
  • Preserves some formatting

Cons:

  • Only works with Notion
  • Conversion quality varies
  • Notion’s Markdown export is non-standard

Best for: Notion users building web content databases.

5. Jina Reader

Type: API Service Price: Free tier, paid plans Platforms: API (any platform)

Jina Reader (r.jina.ai) is an API that converts any URL to LLM-friendly Markdown.

Pros:

  • API-based (great for automation)
  • Optimized for LLM consumption
  • Handles JavaScript-rendered pages
  • Free tier available

Cons:

  • Requires coding to use
  • No browser extension
  • Rate limits on free tier

Best for: Developers building RAG systems or automated pipelines.

6. Pandoc

Type: Command-line tool Price: Free (open-source) Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux

Pandoc is the Swiss Army knife of document conversion. It can convert HTML to Markdown (and dozens of other formats).

Pros:

  • Extremely powerful and flexible
  • Batch processing
  • Many output formats
  • Highly customizable

Cons:

  • Requires command-line knowledge
  • Need to download HTML first
  • No automatic content extraction

Best for: Technical users who need batch processing or format flexibility.

7. html2text (Python)

Type: Python library Price: Free (open-source) Platforms: Any (Python)

A Python library for converting HTML to Markdown programmatically.

Pros:

  • Easy to integrate into Python projects
  • Customizable output
  • Good for automation

Cons:

  • Requires Python knowledge
  • No browser integration
  • Basic conversion only

Best for: Python developers building custom tools.

Which Tool Should You Choose?

For Everyday Use

Choose Save — the AI-powered extraction produces the cleanest output with zero effort.

For Obsidian Users

Choose Obsidian Web Clipper — direct vault integration is unbeatable for Obsidian workflows.

For Developers

Choose Jina Reader or html2text — API and library options for automation.

For Offline/Privacy

Choose MarkDownload — works offline with no data sent to servers.

For Power Users

Choose Pandoc — when you need maximum flexibility and batch processing.

The Bottom Line

For most users, Save offers the best experience. The AI-powered extraction means you get clean, usable Markdown without spending time on cleanup. The free tier lets you try it, and the Pro plan is worth it if you save webpages regularly.

If you have specific needs (Obsidian integration, offline use, automation), the specialized tools above may be better fits.

Try Save Free →

Have questions? Reach out at [email protected]